|
It's like the gently rising crescendo of the cicada song that fills Mediterranean
air during the day, except that here it's a rising crescendo of human
voices, chanting almost as one, 'why is it so expensive in Ireland?' Two
things have moved this question to the forefront of peoples' minds: summer
holidays on the continent and the novel ability to make direct price comparisons
thanks to the Euro. When you've bought wine on the continent for a couple
of euro a bottle, or beer that you pay for in cents, you can't help but
ask yourself 'why so?'
Sometimes it's the little things that make the most impact. I bought a
round of drinks in my local bar in Italy a month ago for nine people.
The bill was 8 euros. It's moments like this that make you blink your
eyes in wonder. The more you walk into shops on the continent and look
at the prices, the more you're filled with mixed emotions; firstly the
pleasant feeling that everything appears to be a bargain and then a niggling
feeling of dismay that once the holiday's over you'll be back to Irish
prices.
Prices are affected by a number of factors. Perhaps the most significant
is that when money is abundant, prices rise to absorb it. No doubt Ireland
has seen ten years of unparalleled growth, and whilst many of us are waiting
for the 'trickle-down effect' to spread the tiger's milk amongst all of
its cubs, prices have risen apace with increased income. But market forces
are not the only influences on the cost of goods and services; governments
can have significant effects through legislation and taxation. For example,
our absurdly high rate of insurance costs are largely the result of legislation,
while cars and wine cost more here than in any other eurozone country
as a result of high duties.
One of the most common conversations I had during my continental summer
was the one that began 'Ah, Ireland, you are the richest people in the
world now, n'est ce pas?' It seems our burgeoning wealth is no
longer a secret, yet I always felt impelled to reply that income alone
is no measure of a standard of living, after all, if everything you need
to buy in order to survive is going to take up all your money, then you
could as well live in Portugal on two-thirds of your Irish income, where
goods and services cost two-thirds of what they do here. If wealth is
to mean anything at all, we should talk of disposable income left after
food, clothing and shelter. Still, the stories keep filling inches of
newsprint, 'Ireland soon richest in EU' or 'Irish GDP soon to overtake
Luxembourg'. Yet do we feel rich?
A recent survey by MRBI discovered that one in four people were convinced
that prices had risen well above the level of inflation since the advent
of the euro. As a weekly shopper myself I have exactly the same feeling,
but let's look at some statistics. According to the Central Statistics
Office, the annual inflation rate up to April 2002 was 4.8%, but is that
right? Retail Intelligence conducted its own survey using a limited shopping
basket and found a different outcome. In a price survey comparison between
July 2001 and June 2002, Dunnes Stores clocked up a 14.6% price increase,
Superquinn a 12.49% increase and Tesco showed price increases of 10.6%.
That certainly feels closer to my experience than the 4.8% computed by
the CSO, but then again the Retail Intelligence survey focussed solely
on supermarket prices, whereas the CSO covers a broader base. Internal
inflation aside, Eurostat, the European Union's statistical arm, has found
that a list of goods and services which costs €100 in Ireland would
cost less in 10 other European Union states based on 2000 prices. Put
another way, Eurostat's latest cost of living report has found that Ireland
is the second most expensive country in the euro currency zone.
For most people, income is spent largely on the three basics; food, clothing
and shelter, so it's in these areas that we most notice and care about
increases in costs. Housing has become so expensive it's a wonder any
young couple can find the money to buy a house at all. When we arrive
at the point that a ten-bedroomed chateau in Normandy, complete with parkland
and outhouses, can be bought for less than a semi in suburban Dublin,
you know that something's out of kilter. Out of a sense of pure mischief,
let me run a conspiracy theory past you. It goes like this: back in the
early nineties a lot of people owned their own homes and many had almost
finished paying off their mortgages. Anyone in the business of lending
money would have been looking to the future with apprehension, after all,
if everyone owns their house, who are they going sell mortgages to? The
solution is to fuel increases in the price of houses by making borrowing
easy. This has two effects, firstly it makes existing home-owners feel
rich and secondly it makes it hard for new buyers. So when a young couple
try to find a deposit for their house, for many the only solution is to
persuade parents to re-mortgage their now valuable family home to help
fund a deposit. At a stroke, the lender now has two mortgages to profit
from, one of which will cost the young couple dearly. Like any good conspiracy
theory there are no hard facts to back it up, but yet it has a ring of
truth. The fact remains that here in Ireland we have one of the most expensive
housing markets in the world and some mortgage companies are looking hard
at the Japanese model of a fifty-year mortgage that can be spread over
more than one generation, a truly dismal prospect. In effect it would
make the lenders the landlords and we the tenants.
It would be a hard world indeed if life were composed only of necessities.
Alcohol is a drug of choice for many and tobacco for a diminishing number.
The reason why they're both so expensive here is mostly because of government
duties and taxes. We pay €2.70 in duty on every litre of wine plus
VAT at 21% on the retail price, whereas the Germans, French, Italians,
Spanish, Austrians, Portuguese and Luxembourgers pay no duty at all. When
it comes to beer, the minimum duty in the EU is just under 2%, but the
Irish Government charges nearly ten times that amount. We've told ourselves
over the years that this isn't just taxation, it's really social engineering.
The theory goes that high rates of duty and tax on the old staples of
fags and booze are actually a means of discouraging our citizens from
using them, thus improving their health. You may like to believe this
fiction, but the fact remains that booze and fags are selling as well
as ever, which means that the state's take from these items is also rising
inexorably. In case you're not a smoker, cigarettes cost from €1.50
to about €3.50 depending on the brand in France and a little less
in Italy, compared with over €5 here. When you consider how much
revenue is raised by these taxes alone it's not surprising that the Department
of Finance says it is opposed to tax harmonisation across the European
Union.
I'm old enough to remember when we were asked to vote on whether Ireland
should join the European Union or not. At the time much was said about
eventual price harmonisation and soon cars would cost the same as in the
rest of Europe instead of 40% more. The Irish government managed to obtain
derogation after derogation on this one, and we still have the most expensive
cars in Europe and the most expensive car insurance. There's a joke in
Strasbourg that a visiting delegation of Irish politicians ought to be
called a 'derogation'. Since our joining, prices have moved only in one
direction, and that's not downwards.
When it comes to feeding ourselves we have much the same problem. We
pay more for our food than most nations. This comes as a puzzle to people
who learnt at school that Ireland was a major food-exporting nation. This
a country that produces cattle and sheep in large numbers, and milk traditionally
comes in a glut during the autumn calving season. The milk glut prompted
the rise of indigenous cheese producers from the mid-eighties, a sensible
economic policy to make the best use of Irish resources. And yet a kilo
of basic, ordinary cheese costs around €8 on the continent and around
€12 a kilo here, some 50% more. Is it the producers or the retailers
who take this bonus? Some years ago a farmer taking a finished lamb to
market would have been lucky to get £25, yet at butchers' counters
that lamb would have retailed in pieces for well over £100. Someone
somewhere, that mysterious Mr. Nobody, seems to be taking the profits
that no one else will admit to making - a point that was made to me by
Dermott Jewell of the Consumers Association.
But the biggest price differential can be found in the fruit and vegetable
department. In France and Italy you can go to a market and buy a kilo
of apples or oranges for less than the price of a single fruit here. It's
true that Irish produce has been affected by bad weather, but considering
so many of the fruits and vegetables on the shelves come from Dutch greenhouses,
it's hard to understand why tomatoes at Dunnes Stores could have risen
by over 40% in 11 months and why a medium-sized cucumber has jumped by
some 90% over this time last year.
You may have noticed that I referred to fruit and vegetable markets.
All over the continent, in every tiny town, at least once a week, there's
a fruit and vegetable market where local growers from the large to the
small put their wares on offer to the public. This ancient and simple
system puts the producer into direct contact with the buyer. The grower
gets more than he would from a wholesale merchant and the customer pays
far less than he would in a shop. There's no one in the middle of the
transaction to add to the costs. Not only is it a cheap way to buy, but
you get fresher produce. A further corollary is that supermarkets are
constrained to keep their prices down, as it's so easy to buy in the street
markets.
The nearest we have to this in Ireland are farm shops and a few farmers'
markets. Mark Michel's organic farm shop is about a twenty minute drive
from me and there's a new farmers' market down the road in Laragh, so
I'm better served than most. But farm shops don't have the same easy access
as a local market just outside your door and the few farmers' markets
tend to be dominated by speciality produce. The fact is you'd be unlikely
to drive a good few miles just to buy a bag of spuds, a head of lettuce
and a sprig of parsley. We're almost constrained to do our daily or weekly
household shop in a supermarket, simply for the convenience of it. What
that means, is that we've given the big chains the right to do the choosing
on our behalf. They decide what colour of apple you want, what length
you want your carrots, how straight you want your bananas, how seedless
you want your grapes and what size of tomato will suit you best. Any supplier
has to meet their specifications.
That means we've had to become specialised. There are potato growers,
sprouts growers, lettuce growers and so forth, people who grow nothing
else. Even if we had local markets the specialist boys would hardly be
bothered taking a tiny fraction of one per cent of their crop to them.
A specialised grower can only sell to a big retailer and that's exactly
what happens here. I asked a grower I know if he could tell me why vegetables
cost so much. This simple question unleashed a tirade directed at legislation.
If you supply supermarkets, they require you to be registered with Bord
Glas. Once registered you have to find the best part of €150,000
to build a bird and insect-proof packing house to the required specifications
with hot and cold running water, tray-washing facilities as well as fork-lifts
and palettes to ensure that trays never touch the ground. I won't bore
you with the rest of the requirements, but the paperwork is horrendous.
The obligatory daily check-list covers around 150 items all of which have
to be filled in and they are regularly inspected by Bord Glas, and that's
before you fill in the supermarket's own check list.
All of this is designed to ensure that vegetables are hygienically picked
and packed before arriving on the shelves, a worthy and entirely sensible
thing. The trouble is that it doesn't come free of cost. Where once recyclable
trays could be used, now sanitised trays at 40 cents are the norm. Protective
clothing, plastic gloves, hairnets and boots all have to be provided.
When they're picking there have to be portaloos every 300 yards with hot
and cold water out in the fields. The government inspectors, from Bord
Glas to the Weights and Measures, and the bureaucracy that supports them,
all have to be paid for and it all gets loaded onto the price you pay
in the shops. Don't forget, this is all because it's assumed that you're
unwilling or unable to wash the vegetables when you get them home.
That's the difference between here and the continent. Those continental
street markets aren't subject to this raft of regulation. Anyone who grows
anything can pick it, put it in a trailer and take it to market. If the
grower had a pee while picking tomatoes no one knows and no one cares
- they'll be washed anyway. Without intervention from government, the
prices are kept low. You might well bemoan the demise of the Moore Street
trader, the last place in the capital where fruit and vegetables could
often be bought for as little as a third of supermarket prices.
No one that I know of ever got sick from eating vegetables, but if you
think the regulations I've outlined are Kafkaesque, the ones that apply
to the meat industry are even more so. The more I found out, the more
I began to get the feeling that the mysterious Mr. Nobody who eats away
at profits and pushes up prices was being uncovered. The reason that a
farmer gets so little for his livestock and you pay so much at the butcher's
has a lot to do with the expenses that abattoirs are forced to make, to
keep up with ever more labyrinthine regulations. The dead hand of government
is there at every turn.
When you ask yourself why we need all these regulations and all this
paperwork, only one answer comes; insurance. As a nation we're litigious.
The courts are an easier route to riches than the Lotto and the odds are
better. A bug in a punnet of cherry tomatoes could be a ticket to wealth,
so that's why the paperwork that goes with their packing is so detailed.
It's so detailed that if someone cuts their finger anywhere near a packing
room, they have to wear special plasters that contain a metal strip so
that if a plaster fell into a package it would get picked up by a metal
detector. Somebody along every step of the paper trail has signed something,
and blame can be pin-pointed and apportioned. You need insurance at every
step as well, and that pushes up prices. I spoke to Karl Purdy of Bond
restaurant and he told me that last year his insurance was £4,000.
This year they wanted €25,000. Eventually he got it for €16,000,
but there's only one way that this increase can be met and that's by hiking
his prices. I know that this is anecdotal evidence, but it's in line with
other findings. In a survey of 500 retailers conducted in the second week
of July this year, 71% said their insurance costs had increased this year,
with a staggering 28% experiencing increases of over 70%. The average
increase was 43%, so expect to find that mirrored in prices in due course.
It's the classic vicious circle. No matter what you do for a living you
have to charge a lot for your goods or services, because whatever you
need to buy will cost a lot of money. A tourist from the eurozone would
find Ireland staggeringly expensive. In France there are many hotel chains
like Formule 1 and Premier Classe where a room for three people costs
under €30 for the night. You'd be lucky to find a bed for one person
here at that price. Restaurants, too, are more expensive than on the continent,
but their running costs are significantly higher, largely because of spiralling
wages and the high cost of the raw ingredients. These days a restaurant
would be lucky to keep wages at under 40% of turnover and ingredient costs
at less than 35%. That's already three-quarters of your bill, after you've
subtracted the 21% of it that the government takes in VAT. That doesn't
leave much to pay for light and heat, insurance, maintenance, breakages
and dare I say it, a profit?
A week ago I was sure that simple greed was the answer to the question
'why is it so expensive in Ireland?' Now I'm sure that's not the answer.
Greed may well be a part of the equation, but if it is, it's a small part.
The simple truth is that the money has to come from somewhere. If people
keep suing and claiming from insurance companies we all get to pay for
it in the end with higher prices. If we want a nanny state that protects
us from ourselves at every turn, then we have to pay for the people who
are put in place to protect us. Everything comes with a price and the
person at the end of the price chain is the consumer - that's you and
me. But the question we really ought be addressing is are we getting value
for our money? Are those well-meaning government agencies really contributing
to our common weal? Do we really need so many layers of expensive bureaucracy?
Just as an example, there's a chemical that was much used by blackcurrant
growers that has been banned by Bord Glas on the grounds it may have deleterious
effects on our health. Worthy enough. But it's still legal in the UK,
so that's where all the blackcurrants come from, now that the Irish growers
can no longer do the job and you still get to ingest the chemical.
Back in the dim recesses of the last millennium Ireland was viewed from
abroad as a Good Place to Invest. The workforce was highly educated and
in international terms not expensive. Added to that, Ireland was a part
of the EU and was a useful launching pad for that market. But things have
changed now that we pay ourselves so highly. The attractiveness we once
had to foreign investors is diminishing as costs rise. Once upon a time
a government could keep costs down for foreign investors by the simple
expedient of devaluing the currency, but now that we're a part of the
Euro, that corrective device is no longer an option. There's a real danger
that we're pricing ourselves out of the international market.
There are anomalies that I've been unable to account for. Go to a supermarket
in France or Italy and a 1.5 litre bottle of local mineral water costs
between 15 and 30 cents. Buy a six pack of water and nine litres are yours
for less than a euro. So why does it cost €1.30 for a 1.5 litre bottle
of Irish water here - almost the price of petrol? Water is water all around
the planet, even the PET bottles are universal. Is this profiteering,
or is it something to do with distribution costs? If it's the costs of
distribution, then it's hard to understand how they could account for
the water costing an average of five times as much. Coffee is an internationally
traded commodity, so you'd expect prices to be much the same in the eurozone.
Not so; in France and Italy an espresso is less than a euro and a cappuccino
costs just one. Why do we pay up to €2 for an espresso and well over
that for a cappuccino? I'd suggest that it's a case of what the market
will bear. If you're prepared to pay that much, someone will be happy
to sell it at that price. Perhaps the Greeks had the right idea with a
consumer boycott. The only way for consumers to fight back is simply to
refuse to buy at exorbitant prices.
Thanks to: Dermott Jewell, Consumers Association, Chris Culleton, Ferrycarrig
Hotel and Gerry Foley of the Central Statistics Office.
Useful web sites:
www.cso.ie
www.consumerassociation.ie
www.retailintelligence.ie
|
|